As a recruiter, you're always on the lookout for the best talent. For years, resumes have been your go-to – they tell you where candidates went to school, their work history, and their achievements. But there's a catch: the job market is rapidly changing, and relying solely on resumes might not be enough anymore.
According to the World Economic Forum, by 2025, half of all workers will need new skills because jobs are evolving quickly. Plus, critical skills for most roles, like teamwork, problem-solving, and adaptability, often don't come across in a resume.
In this blog, you'll discover why it might be time to shift your focus from traditional resume-based hiring to a more effective approach. You'll learn why skills testing could be a more effective way to find great candidates and how it can help you make smarter hiring decisions.
The Limitations of Resume Screening
Inaccuracy and Misrepresentation
As a recruiter, you might have noticed that what you see on a resume isn’t always what you get. It's a common scenario: a candidate looks perfect on paper but doesn't live up to expectations in reality.
This discrepancy can be significant, as research have shown that up to 78% of resumes are misleading and 46% contain actual lies. This means when you're evaluating resumes, there's a significant chance you're making decisions based on inaccurate information.
Unconscious Biases
Resumes can unintentionally introduce unconscious biases into your decision-making process. Without meaning to, you might lean towards candidates from certain schools or with certain job titles.
For example, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that applicants with white-sounding names received 50% more callbacks than those with African-American sounding names, despite identical qualifications.
This bias isn't just about fairness; it affects your ability to source the best talent, potentially causing you to overlook highly qualified candidates due to subconscious preferences.
Doesn’t Predict Future Performance
Another crucial limitation is the inability of resumes to predict future job performance accurately. Laszlo Bock, former SVP of People Operations at Google, pointed out that grades and test scores are “worthless as criteria for hiring” as they don’t predict job performance.
This highlights that historical data such as education and past job titles on a resume might not effectively indicate whether a candidate will succeed in your current open position, especially in a rapidly evolving job market.
Why Traditional Resumes Are Falling Short
The Rapidly Changing Job Market
In today's rapidly evolving job market, the roles and skills required are constantly shifting. Technological advancements, changes in consumer preferences, and global events can reshape industries overnight.
This means that the job you hired for last year might not be the same as the one you're hiring for now. The traditional resume, with its focus on past experiences and qualifications, often struggles to keep up with these rapid changes. It's like trying to navigate a fast-paced river with an outdated map.
Hidden Qualities on Resumes
Traditional resumes tend to put a spotlight on formal qualifications and hard skills. These include degrees, certifications, and specific technical abilities, which are undoubtedly important.
However, they represent just one layer of a candidate's potential. In today's dynamic workplaces, soft skills such as communication, adaptability, problem-solving, and teamwork are equally crucial.
Unfortunately, these qualities often remain hidden behind the bullet points on a resume. It's like judging a book solely by its cover, missing the depth and richness of its contents.
The Limited Perspective
Imagine a resume as a keyhole through which you glimpse a candidate's career. It offers only a limited perspective, like viewing a vast landscape through a tiny window. This restricted view can lead to missed opportunities and incomplete assessments of candidates. Exceptional individuals may not neatly fit the traditional resume format, causing you to overlook their potential.
In fact, research shows that 68% of employers have hired a candidate who didn't have the exact skills or qualifications listed in the job posting. This statistic highlights the limitations of resume-based hiring, where the keyhole view can cause you to miss out on hidden treasures of talent.
Top Resume Screening Challenges
The 7-Second Glance
Consider this: recruiters spend a mere 7.4 seconds on average reviewing a resume. That's less time than it takes to brew a cup of coffee. In this fleeting moment, they are expected to make a profound decision about a candidate's potential fit for a role. This rushed process often results in missing out on exceptional candidates who don't neatly fit the traditional resume template.
Statistics reveal that this quick glance approach can lead to missed opportunities. For instance, a study found that recruiters spend about 80% of their resume review time on just six data points: candidate's name, current title, current employer, previous title, previous employer, and education. Such a limited focus overlooks crucial skills, experiences, and potential that may not be evident in these six data points.
Handling a Flood of Resumes
In today's digital age, job postings can attract a staggering number of applicants, often reaching hundreds or more. However, the majority of these applicants submit generic, shotgun-style resumes. These resumes lack the necessary relevance to the specific job at hand, making it challenging for recruiters to identify suitable candidates.
The consequence of this inundation of irrelevant applications is that hiring managers are left sifting through a sea of resumes, hoping to find the proverbial needle in the haystack. It's a time-consuming and often frustrating process that doesn't guarantee the discovery of top talent.
Fatigue in Resume Review
Recruiters are, understandably, exhausted by the sheer volume of resumes they receive. The constant barrage of applications, each requiring careful evaluation, can lead to what we call "resume fatigue." This fatigue manifests as a sense of weariness from manual resume screening.
The result of resume fatigue is a rushed and, at times, superficial evaluation of candidates. Recruiters may find themselves tempted to take shortcuts in the screening process, which can lead to missing out on exceptional candidates who deserve a more thorough review.
Bias in Decision-Making
In the rush to review resumes quickly, another concerning factor comes into play - confirmation bias. This cognitive bias occurs when recruiters unconsciously favor candidates who align with their preconceived notions or biases.
For example, if a recruiter has a preconception that candidates from certain universities are more desirable, they may subconsciously give preference to applicants from those institutions. This bias can lead to overlooking highly qualified individuals who may not fit the expected profile but possess valuable skills and experiences.
The Resume of Lies
One of the most significant challenges in traditional resume screening is the prevalence of dishonesty. Candidates may embellish, exaggerate, or even falsify information on their resumes in an attempt to appear more qualified or experienced than they are. This deception extends to various aspects of their resumes, including job experience, job duties, employment dates, skills, and even salary history.
Statistics reveal the extent of this problem. Surveys have shown that 56% of job applicants admit to lying on their resumes. These fabrications create a misleading representation of a candidate's qualifications and make it difficult for recruiters to trust the information presented.
Resume Hacking
In a world where Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) play a pivotal role in resume screening, candidates have learned to manipulate their resumes to align with the keywords and criteria that these systems prioritize. This practice, known as resume hacking, involves tailoring resumes to include specific buzzwords and phrases that are likely to pass through ATS filters.
ATS systems typically reject a significant portion of resumes, with approximately 75% of them being rejected by ATS resume checkers. To combat this high rejection rate, candidates have resorted to tactics like keyword stuffing, where they fill their resumes with irrelevant buzzwords and clichés to increase their chances of passing the ATS filter.
Resume hacking poses a significant challenge for recruiters, as it can result in resumes that do not accurately reflect a candidate's qualifications and capabilities. This practice undermines the integrity of the screening process and can lead to suboptimal hiring decisions.
The Impact of Deception
The consequences of resume lies and hacking are far-reaching. When recruiters base their decisions on misleading information, it can lead to the selection of candidates who may not possess the skills or experience they claim. This mismatch between a candidate's stated qualifications and their actual abilities can result in poor job performance and high turnover rates.
Moreover, the time and resources spent on verifying the accuracy of resumes can be substantial. Background checks, reference calls, and additional screening steps become necessary to validate the information provided on resumes. This adds complexity and cost to the hiring process.
How-To Never Screen Candidate Resumes Again
We've already discussed the limitations and flaws of resume screening. From the prevalence of resume embellishments to the impact of biases, it's clear that this traditional approach has significant shortcomings. It's time to shift our focus from what candidates claim they can do to what they can actually do.
The Power of Skills Assessment
Skills assessment involves evaluating candidates based on their actual abilities and competencies rather than relying solely on their resumes. This approach offers several advantages:
- Eliminates Human and Machine Bias: Skills assessment reduces the influence of both human biases and AI algorithm biases. It focuses on objective evaluation, ensuring a fairer selection process.
- Universal Equalizer: It doesn't discriminate based on factors like educational background or previous job titles. Candidates from diverse backgrounds have an equal opportunity to showcase their skills.
- Identifies Extraordinary Talent: Skills assessment helps identify candidates who possess exceptional skills and talents that may not be evident on a traditional resume.
- Saves Time and Resources: By automating the assessment process, recruiters save valuable time and resources that would otherwise be spent reviewing resumes.
- Customization: Skills assessments can be tailored to specific job requirements, ensuring that candidates are evaluated based on the skills relevant to the role.
The Evidence-Based Approach
The effectiveness of skills assessment is supported by extensive research. Over the years, studies have consistently shown that skills assessment is a strong predictor of job performance. Research findings indicate that the top three indicators of performance are:
- Structured Interviews: Conducting interviews with standardized questions and evaluation criteria helps assess a candidate's suitability for a role.
- Work Samples: Evaluating a candidate's actual work samples or projects provides tangible evidence of their capabilities.
- Cognitive Tests: These assessments evaluate problem-solving abilities, critical thinking, and decision-making skills, making them valuable predictors of job performance.
By adopting an evidence-based approach to recruitment through skills assessment, recruiters can make more informed and data-driven hiring decisions.
The way forward for recruiters is to find the best candidates who can excel in their roles and contribute to organizations. To achieve this, it's time to embrace skills assessment as a superior alternative to resume screening.
By focusing on what candidates can demonstrate rather than what they claim, you can identify top talent more effectively and ensure a fairer and more inclusive hiring process.
Embracing a Smarter Hiring Approach
The world of recruitment is evolving, and as recruiters, it's our responsibility to adapt to these changes. Traditional resume screening, with its inherent flaws and limitations, is no longer sufficient for identifying top talent. Instead, we should turn to skills assessment, an evidence-based approach that focuses on what candidates can do rather than what they claim on their resumes.
By incorporating skills assessment into our hiring processes, we can:
- Make more informed and data-driven decisions.
- Eliminate biases and promote fairness and inclusivity.
- Identify candidates with exceptional skills and talents.
- Align with the demands of the modern job market.
In a world where half of all workers will need new skills by 2025, we must ensure that our hiring practices are up to the task. Skills assessment is the key to unlocking the potential of our candidates and making smarter hiring decisions that benefit both organizations and job seekers. It's time to leave the outdated resume screening behind and embrace a smarter approach to recruitment.
Improve recruitment process with WeCP
At WeCP, we understand the challenges of modern recruitment. That's why we offer a solution that makes hiring simpler and faster, allowing you to find quality candidates quickly.
Our platform empowers employers to prioritize skills-based hiring by comprehensively assessing candidates on both their technical skills and soft skills, including problem-solving and communication. We evaluate candidates across more than 12 essential metrics, providing you with a holistic view of their capabilities.
With WeCP, you gain the ability to dive deep into a candidate's hard and soft skills, enhancing the effectiveness of your recruitment process. This streamlined approach not only saves you time but also substantially reduces your cost per hire.
Get started with WeCP for free or schedule a demo with us for more information.
.png)
.svg){kind=logo}